Bluehost review: Is it a good shared hosting service?

Because I needed a dependable host and had read that Bluehost was an established business with a good reputation and competitive pricing, I decided to sign up with them.
To provide static HTML sites, the shared hosting business model was developed in the 1990s. Given that a webpage was typically 500 kilobytes or less, it functions well in that setting. Because all the server was actually doing was transmitting files to the user, even when they grew to a few megabytes in size, they continued to function.
Websites today are much more complex. The majority of websites use a server-side programming language like PHP. On a WordPress site, a single user can easily need 5 MB to 15 MB of system RAM every request, and fat sites occasionally need much more.
There is a limit to how many websites may be securely served by a single server with sufficient RAM and CPU capability. Planning the appropriate number of users per server is also nearly difficult due to the vast variation in resource requirements among WordPress sites.
Pros
- Free domain and SSL certificate
- Convenient business-focused tools
- Modern and easy to use interface
- Highly reliable servers
- Website staging area
Cons
Servers only in US
Bottom line: You should got for Bluehost if youre planning on running wordpress.